[aerogear-dev] Web Push protocol WGLC

Tue Jun 14 23:53:26 EDT 2016

On Tuesday, 14 June 2016, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Update for the latest week:
>
> We discussed the questions, which I asked previously (follow previous
> links). Most of them are closed now.
>
> In addition here were a few new contributions/questions:
>
>    - Discussion about "Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message
>    Receipts":
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00607
>    - Fixing typo: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/118
>    - Replacing Push Messages just with Topic. Why?
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00618
>
> Brian Raymor (one of the authors of Web Push protocol) added me to the
> Acknowledgements part of the draft :) Small achievement)
> https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/#rfc.section.10
>
> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commit/319d3f6ee5e5741f22a2ed600b137c507e6b0b04
>
>
wow! this is huge!!

keep up the good work!
Thanks for these updates, really appreciated!

> We are also trying to schedule a time slot with him for chatting to
> discuss some issues and he asked me about attendance on IETF96 this July:
> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matzew at apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Idel,
>>
>> thanks a lot, this is good feedback on the status!
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
>> idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Community provides a good feedback and a lot of changes were merged. WG
>>> decided to postpone WGLC for a 2 weeks to resolve all issues.
>>>
>>> New discussion threads were initiated by me:
>>>
>>>    1. Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA:
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00578
>>>    2. Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts:
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00579
>>>    3. When UA should send an acknowledgement?
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00580
>>>    4. 414 Request-URL Too Long:
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00581
>>>    5. Try to deliver receipt at least once, even if TTL expired:
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00582
>>>    6. Delivery receipt may be sent before AS request delivery:
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00597
>>>
>>> For some of them new GitHub issues was created. Also here is one issue
>>> without sending messages to the Web Push mailing list:
>>>
>>> Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message Receipts:
>>> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/113
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>> --
>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
>>> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','daniel.bevenius at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My
>>>> suggestion will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3],
>>>> because they merged a few changes this week [4].
>>>> I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare time
>>>> to do this at the moment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback
>>>>> as soon as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've initiated a few thread:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1.
>>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549
>>>>>    2.
>>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559
>>>>>
>>>>> Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the
>>>>> draft for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion
>>>>> will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they
>>>>> merged a few changes this week [4].
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524
>>>>> [2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
>>>>> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05
>>>>> [4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>>> --
>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160615/2f8462b7/attachment-0001.html 