[aerogear-dev] Web Push protocol WGLC

Wed Jun 15 03:18:10 EDT 2016

Thank you, Matthias! :)

The 6th version released 3 hours ago:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tuesday, 14 June 2016, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Update for the latest week:
>>
>> We discussed the questions, which I asked previously (follow previous
>> links). Most of them are closed now.
>>
>> In addition here were a few new contributions/questions:
>>
>>    - Discussion about "Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message
>>    Receipts":
>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00607
>>    - Fixing typo: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/118
>>    - Replacing Push Messages just with Topic. Why?
>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00618
>>
>> Brian Raymor (one of the authors of Web Push protocol) added me to the
>> Acknowledgements part of the draft :) Small achievement)
>> https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/#rfc.section.10
>>
>> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commit/319d3f6ee5e5741f22a2ed600b137c507e6b0b04
>>
>>
> wow! this is huge!!
>
> keep up the good work!
> Thanks for these updates, really appreciated!
>
>
>
>> We are also trying to schedule a time slot with him for chatting to
>> discuss some issues and he asked me about attendance on IETF96 this July:
>> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>> --
>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Idel,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot, this is good feedback on the status!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
>>> idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Community provides a good feedback and a lot of changes were merged. WG
>>>> decided to postpone WGLC for a 2 weeks to resolve all issues.
>>>>
>>>> New discussion threads were initiated by me:
>>>>
>>>>    1. Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA:
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00578
>>>>    2. Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts:
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00579
>>>>    3. When UA should send an acknowledgement?
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00580
>>>>    4. 414 Request-URL Too Long:
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00581
>>>>    5. Try to deliver receipt at least once, even if TTL expired:
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00582
>>>>    6. Delivery receipt may be sent before AS request delivery:
>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00597
>>>>
>>>> For some of them new GitHub issues was created. Also here is one issue
>>>> without sending messages to the Web Push mailing list:
>>>>
>>>> Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message Receipts:
>>>> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/113
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>> --
>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
>>>> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My
>>>>> suggestion will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3],
>>>>> because they merged a few changes this week [4].
>>>>> I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare
>>>>> time to do this at the moment).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback
>>>>>> as soon as possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've initiated a few thread:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549
>>>>>>    2.
>>>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the
>>>>>> draft for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion
>>>>>> will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they
>>>>>> merged a few changes this week [4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524
>>>>>> [2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
>>>>>> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05
>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160615/e49a3fea/attachment.html 