[bv-dev] Moving JSR-349 to the JCP rules 2.9

[Ed Burns]

Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:

>I was pretty sure I sent such an email a while back but I can't find
>it.
>
>I would like to move our spec to the latest and more opened JCP rules
>aka 2.9. I am almost certain that we do comply with it and that we even
>go further than what is expected of us. For your info rules 2.8 force
>things like publicly visible and archived communication. We currently
>are under the JCP 2.7 rules.
>
>Here is a list of changes http://jcp.org/en/resources/2.8
>Here is how to migrate http://jcp.org/en/resources/change_jcp_version
>
>Please speak up if you don't want the spec to move to the new rules.
>Otherwise I will proceed next week after turkeys have been thoroughly
>digested by our USA reps :)
>
>Emmanuel
>_______________________________________________
>beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

I am here at DOAG with Patrick Curran and he says that going to 2.8 is something we should do right away. 2.8 and 2.9 are essentially the same.

Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20121122/ddf8a0b9/attachment.html