[bv-dev] Validator#forMethods()

[Sebastian Thomschke]

+1 for naming consistency

Best regards,

Seb

On 04.01.2013 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While working on the TCK, I came across our new method 
> Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method and constructor 
> parameters/return values.
>
> Given that we introduced the term "executable" when referring to both 
> methods and constructors, I wondered whether the method should better 
> be named "forExecutables()".
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Gunnar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20130104/518c8995/attachment.html