[cdi-dev] Fw: Re: CDI 1.1

[Mark Struberg]

btw, can the mailing daemon be configured to automatically contain the list as mail-to? :)

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:

> From: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> To: "Peter Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:06 PM
> is fine with me.
> 
> I just found it a good idea to encourage people to use the
> voting feature of jira. People are not using it often since
> it is most times ignored. If the votes actually have a real
> impact, then people will use it more often - which would in
> turn provide a good feedback for the EG.
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> > To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> > Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:01 PM
> > I see. We can consider doing
> > something like this - I guess what I have asked people
> to do
> > initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We
> can
> > open it up to the community for after the kick off con
> call
> > and get their feedback on whether we are going in the
> right
> > direction. How does that sound?
> > 
> > On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > 
> > > The EG and extended EG first worked through all
> the
> > Jira issues and did some documentation and
> feasibility
> > checks. Before finishing the spec he called for
> feedback in
> > the community basically asking them to vote for the
> jira
> > issues (directly in jira) they see as most important
> to get
> > fixed.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-five-jsf-issues-results?force=703
> > > 
> > > http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523
> > > 
> > > Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top
> ;)
> > > 
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > > 
> > > --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> > >> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> > >> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > >> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM
> > >> Can you briefly explain the system he
> > >> used?
> > >> 
> > >> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>> Congratulations Pete!
> > >>> 
> > >>> What do you think about a public voting
> as Ed
> > did with
> > >> JSF-2.2?
> > >>> Could give some good feedback.
> > >>> 
> > >>> LieGrue,
> > >>> strub
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> > >>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> > >>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011,
> 11:25 AM
> > >>>> Hi everyone
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group.
> I've
> > started
> > >> to
> > >>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please take some
> > >>>> time to read through them.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> I would like everyone to work their
> way
> > through
> > >> the various
> > >>>> lists of issues in JIRA https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and
> > >> do
> > >>>> four things:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> * If you are aware of an issue that
> is
> > not
> > >> recorded, please
> > >>>> create one
> > >>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC
> list
> > should be
> > >> addressed
> > >>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note
> of
> > this, and
> > >> prepare an
> > >>>> email to this list explaining why
> you
> > think the
> > >> issue should
> > >>>> be included. Please restrict yourself
> to
> > three
> > >> such issues.
> > >>>> * If you think an issue on the
> proposed
> > list
> > >> shouldn't be
> > >>>> addressed then please make a note of
> this,
> > and
> > >> prepare an
> > >>>> email to this list explaining why
> you
> > think the
> > >> issue
> > >>>> shouldn't be included. Please
> restrict
> > yourself to
> > >> three
> > >>>> such issues.
> > >>>> * Write a note to the list indicating
> what
> > issues
> > >> you are
> > >>>> going to take a lead on. For major
> issues,
> > prepare
> > >> a 2
> > >>>> minute summary for the concall so
> that you
> > can
> > >> brief people
> > >>>> on the issue.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise
> is
> > Wednesday
> > >> 11th
> > >>>> May. Of course, we can continue to
> debate
> > the
> > >> merits of
> > >>>> issues after this, but to make things
> run
> > smoothly
> > >> it will
> > >>>> help a lot if we can get this done
> > quickly!
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> I propose we have conference call on
> > Thursday 12th
> > >> May to
> > >>>> kick off, overview the main issues
> facing
> > us and
> > >> run through
> > >>>> who will take what issues. Here is
> my
> > proposed
> > >> slot - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+concall&iso=20110512T14&p1=90&ah=1
> > >>>> - it's difficult to find something
> > suitable for
> > >> everyone,
> > >>>> but this does allow both people in
> > Australia (late
> > >> night)
> > >>>> and the US West Coast (our two
> extremes)
> > to
> > >> particpate.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Pete
> > >>>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > >>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> > >>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> > >>>> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > 
> > 
>