[cdi-dev] Fw: Re: CDI 1.1

[Peter Muir]

Yes, but why? This is not normal for a mailing list...

On 27 Apr 2011, at 13:08, Mark Struberg wrote:

> btw, can the mailing daemon be configured to automatically contain the list as mail-to? :)
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> 
>> From: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
>> To: "Peter Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:06 PM
>> is fine with me.
>> 
>> I just found it a good idea to encourage people to use the
>> voting feature of jira. People are not using it often since
>> it is most times ignored. If the votes actually have a real
>> impact, then people will use it more often - which would in
>> turn provide a good feedback for the EG.
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
>>> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
>>> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:01 PM
>>> I see. We can consider doing
>>> something like this - I guess what I have asked people
>> to do
>>> initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We
>> can
>>> open it up to the community for after the kick off con
>> call
>>> and get their feedback on whether we are going in the
>> right
>>> direction. How does that sound?
>>> 
>>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The EG and extended EG first worked through all
>> the
>>> Jira issues and did some documentation and
>> feasibility
>>> checks. Before finishing the spec he called for
>> feedback in
>>> the community basically asking them to vote for the
>> jira
>>> issues (directly in jira) they see as most important
>> to get
>>> fixed.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-five-jsf-issues-results?force=703
>>>> 
>>>> http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523
>>>> 
>>>> Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top
>> ;)
>>>> 
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
>>>>> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
>>>>> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM
>>>>> Can you briefly explain the system he
>>>>> used?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Congratulations Pete!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What do you think about a public voting
>> as Ed
>>> did with
>>>>> JSF-2.2?
>>>>>> Could give some good feedback.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
>>>>>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011,
>> 11:25 AM
>>>>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group.
>> I've
>>> started
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please take some
>>>>>>> time to read through them.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would like everyone to work their
>> way
>>> through
>>>>> the various
>>>>>>> lists of issues in JIRA https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and
>>>>> do
>>>>>>> four things:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * If you are aware of an issue that
>> is
>>> not
>>>>> recorded, please
>>>>>>> create one
>>>>>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC
>> list
>>> should be
>>>>> addressed
>>>>>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note
>> of
>>> this, and
>>>>> prepare an
>>>>>>> email to this list explaining why
>> you
>>> think the
>>>>> issue should
>>>>>>> be included. Please restrict yourself
>> to
>>> three
>>>>> such issues.
>>>>>>> * If you think an issue on the
>> proposed
>>> list
>>>>> shouldn't be
>>>>>>> addressed then please make a note of
>> this,
>>> and
>>>>> prepare an
>>>>>>> email to this list explaining why
>> you
>>> think the
>>>>> issue
>>>>>>> shouldn't be included. Please
>> restrict
>>> yourself to
>>>>> three
>>>>>>> such issues.
>>>>>>> * Write a note to the list indicating
>> what
>>> issues
>>>>> you are
>>>>>>> going to take a lead on. For major
>> issues,
>>> prepare
>>>>> a 2
>>>>>>> minute summary for the concall so
>> that you
>>> can
>>>>> brief people
>>>>>>> on the issue.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise
>> is
>>> Wednesday
>>>>> 11th
>>>>>>> May. Of course, we can continue to
>> debate
>>> the
>>>>> merits of
>>>>>>> issues after this, but to make things
>> run
>>> smoothly
>>>>> it will
>>>>>>> help a lot if we can get this done
>>> quickly!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I propose we have conference call on
>>> Thursday 12th
>>>>> May to
>>>>>>> kick off, overview the main issues
>> facing
>>> us and
>>>>> run through
>>>>>>> who will take what issues. Here is
>> my
>>> proposed
>>>>> slot - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+concall&iso=20110512T14&p1=90&ah=1
>>>>>>> - it's difficult to find something
>>> suitable for
>>>>> everyone,
>>>>>>> but this does allow both people in
>>> Australia (late
>>>>> night)
>>>>>>> and the US West Coast (our two
>> extremes)
>>> to
>>>>> particpate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev