[cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)

[Rick Hightower]

I think CDI has changed its purpose and scope enough that some of the intro
material which made total sense when CDI was forming is now missing the
mark.

CDI sort of evolved what was possible. The intro is still talking about the
CDI you are going to build and the problem it is trying to solve.

CDI 1.1, problem has been solved well, and CDI redefined what was there.

Anyway... the intro material does not match the current scope and where CDI
is today.

I think its important because some folks will never get past the intro... :)

Don't want CDI to be pigeon holed into some role it has but it is so much
more than that.

It is more general purpose than that.

I want to table this. I can offer some rewrites.. But wanted to throw this
out there.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/ContextsAndDependencyInjection11EarlyDraftSubmitted
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>



-- 
*Rick Hightower*
(415) 968-9037
Profile <http://www.google.com/profiles/RichardHightower>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20111013/50972625/attachment.html