[cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)

[Peter Muir]

I would be more than happy to accept rewrites here.

I think the best way is for you to offer a proposal and then we discuss it here...

Thanks!

--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete

On 13 Oct 2011, at 19:16, Rick Hightower <richardhightower at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think CDI has changed its purpose and scope enough that some of the intro material which made total sense when CDI was forming is now missing the mark.
> 
> CDI sort of evolved what was possible. The intro is still talking about the CDI you are going to build and the problem it is trying to solve.
> 
> CDI 1.1, problem has been solved well, and CDI redefined what was there.
> 
> Anyway... the intro material does not match the current scope and where CDI is today.
> 
> I think its important because some folks will never get past the intro... :)
> 
> Don't want CDI to be pigeon holed into some role it has but it is so much more than that.
> 
> It is more general purpose than that.
> 
> I want to table this. I can offer some rewrites.. But wanted to throw this out there. 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/ContextsAndDependencyInjection11EarlyDraftSubmitted
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rick Hightower
> (415) 968-9037 
> Profile 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20111013/6ac7989c/attachment.html