[cdi-dev] bug triage
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Wed Aug 1 17:48:59 EDT 2012
I'll start going through the issue tracker tomorrow.
On 1 Aug 2012, at 18:10, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>
> There should be 3 phases in each bug triage:
>
> 1.
>
> We should take a few bugs where we have already a common understanding of
> the problem and also a common agreement of the direction in which we
> like to solve it, so we can just work out the wording and pitfalls together.
>
> 2.
> We should also try to take a set of 'fresh' issues and find that common understanding and solution
>
> 3.
> (the hardest part) to look at one or two those issues where we do not have a common idea yet. We shall try to layout the pros and cons of each solution and maybe find a better solution that way.
>
> What currently sucks is that we have quite a few pretty clear issues in the tracker and still our last update was 7 months ago...
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>
>> To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 1:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] bug triage
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> FYI right now we have 61 open/reopened bugs and clarifications with priority
>> Major or Critical, and also 76 open/reopened feature requests with priority
>> Major or Critical. Even if we omit feature requests and expect that half of the
>> issues might be closed (e.g. are outdated or no one knows what they are about),
>> there is still about 30 major issues to resolve.
>>
>> I suppose we should go through those 61 issues first, do a proper cleanup and
>> define a set of issues to be discussed/resolved asap.
>>
>> JIRA query link:
>> https://issues.jboss.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+%22CDI+Specification+Issues%22+and+%28status+%3D+Open+or+status+%3D+Reopened%29++and+%28type+%3D+Bug+or+type+%3D+Clarification%29+and+%28priority+%3D+Major+or+priority+%3D+Critical%29+order+by+created+asc
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Dne 18.7.2012 18:16, Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I propose that we hole a monthly bug triage meeting for CDI. We are not
>> having enough progress atm, and despite having a few pull requests open, there
>> is no orchestrated effort to get those applied.
>>>
>>> Pete and I talked about having a hangout meeting where we try to close a
>> few of those bugs.
>>>
>>> When do we like to start?
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list