[cdi-dev] Transaction Scope for CDI
Lincoln Baxter
lbaxter at redhat.com
Tue May 22 20:04:54 EDT 2012
Is CDI really the right place for this Annotation?
It sounds like this has behavior specific to JTA, which leads me to think that it should be added in the JTA spec, not the CDI spec. What needs to change in the core CDI behavior to make this possible, if anything? If this can be achieved with existing SPIs, then I don't see why CDI would need to change at all to support this.
~Lincoln
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reza Rahman" <reza_rahman at lycos.com>
To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:28:13 PM
Subject: [cdi-dev] Transaction Scope for CDI
CDI enthusiasts,
Pete, I and Nigel (JMS 2 spec lead) have been discussing the issue of the transaction scope behind the scenes the past few weeks. Attached is what we came up with and feel it meets the various related use-cases the most effectively. The downside is that it is quite involved (conceptually) and might take a bit of patience to absorb. Please give it a read and let me know your thoughts.
Cheers,
Reza
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20120522/778b17dd/attachment.html
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list