[cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?

[Mark Struberg]

No, it was just a joke, really!

You have been asking if someone has a small topic for the remaining 4 minutes. And I just said that we could try and solve CDI-129 then ;)

CDI-129 would first need JavaEE8 to properly define the ClassLoader hierarchy. Before this is fixed we cannot do much in that regard. 

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 3:56
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?
> 
> Someone yesterday mentioned CDI 129 (Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in 
> EARs) [1] at the end of the meeting.
> I didn’t add it to the MR in the 1st place because it seemed a too big issue for 
> a MR, yet it is a popular one.
> 
> Do you think it’s realistic to add and discuss this issue ?
> 
> 
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
> 
> Antoine
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>