[cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

What a relief :-D


Le 26 nov. 2013 à 13:52, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> a écrit :

> No, it was just a joke, really!
> 
> You have been asking if someone has a small topic for the remaining 4 minutes. And I just said that we could try and solve CDI-129 then ;)
> 
> CDI-129 would first need JavaEE8 to properly define the ClassLoader hierarchy. Before this is fixed we cannot do much in that regard. 
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
>> To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 3:56
>> Subject: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?
>> 
>> Someone yesterday mentioned CDI 129 (Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in 
>> EARs) [1] at the end of the meeting.
>> I didn’t add it to the MR in the 1st place because it seemed a too big issue for 
>> a MR, yet it is a popular one.
>> 
>> Do you think it’s realistic to add and discuss this issue ?
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
>> 
>> Antoine
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>