[cdi-dev] Problem with JDK8 u60 and synthesized methods for lambdas now exposing annotations

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

OWB handles synthetic methods already AFAIK, surely why we see this behavior


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-08-27 14:18 GMT+02:00 arjan tijms <arjan.tijms at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Agreed, this looks like a bug in Weld.
>
> I checked on OWB too (using TomEE 7.0-snapshot), this time using the
> reproducer as given here: https://github.com/payara/Payara/issues/407
>
> And on OWB there did not seem to be any problems.
>
> To double check I added another observer method to the test class that
> should fail deployment, namely:
>
>    public void foo(@Observes String someString, Integer thisshouldFail) {
>         List<String> strList = Arrays.asList("s1", "s2", "s3");
>         final int a = 0;
>         final int b = 1;
>
>         strList.forEach((s) -> { System.out.printf("%s - %d - %d -
> %s\n", someString, a, b, s); });
>     }
>
> And that one indeed failed (as it should).
>
> So it looks like this particular problem is localized to Weld.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150827/a599e263/attachment.html