[cdi-dev] Clarify scopes and serialization
Werner Keil
werner.keil at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 05:30:05 EST 2015
That you'd have to ask the Servlet Spec Leads:
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=369
As of now, it seems Tomitribe has no EG Member there, but I'm sure you
could discuss anything with them if you feel it is a burden or makes no
sense;-)
Werner
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau at gmail.com>
wrote:
> point is while serialization itself is not specified you have no more
> guarantee with Serializable. ATM you can serialize your bean
> passivationId and keep your bean instance in memory (in a map). You
> didnt serialize anything excepted a string!
>
> So why forcing such a constraint if it is an implementation detail?
> Serialization process is not explicit so then constraint doesnt
> guarantee any portability
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-02-03 11:22 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com>:
> > Guess Jozef pretty much hit the point, I don't care about the sticker or
> > label you may put on your laptop or product, but a compatible behavior
> > allowing users to deploy against as many available containers as possible
> > with minimal or no changes at all;-)
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If we want applications to be portable across different implementations
> >> then the spec should require the least common multiple - that is beans
> that
> >> belong to passivating scopes being serializable. TomEE/OWB is free to
> have a
> >> mode in which passivation requirements are not checked if the server
> runs in
> >> non-passivating mode.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/03/2015 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>>
> >>> servlet spec requirement is only for distributed systems AFAIK == not
> >>> required in most of instances.
> >>> tomee supports both and is aligned on tomcat for all tomee flavors and
> >>> is serialization-less in openejb flavors
> >>>
> >>> That said this is not a certification question but a usage question
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2015-02-03 10:59 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>> What about TomEE?
> >>>> After all it's Java EE 6 certified:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/overview/compatibility-jsp-136984.html
> >>>>
> >>>> So as Mark mentioned briefly, there is a requirement by the Servlet
> >>>> spec, so
> >>>> I assume it is either always on or at least on by default (otherwise a
> >>>> TomEE
> >>>> "tweaked" like that would no longer be Java EE compliant;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Tomcat itself was never certified.
> >>>>
> >>>> Werner
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
> >>>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>>>> cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>>>> cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>>>> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Today's Topics:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Re: Clarify scopes and serialization (Mark Struberg)
> >>>>> 2. Re: Clarify scopes and serialization (Romain Manni-Bucau)
> >>>>> 3. Re: Clarify scopes and serialization (Mark Struberg)
> >>>>> 4. Re: Clarify scopes and serialization (Romain Manni-Bucau)
> >>>>> 5. Re: Async events. We need ideas to improve CDI-499
> >>>>> (Jozef Hartinger)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Message: 4
> >>>>> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:50:44 +0100
> >>>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau at gmail.com>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Clarify scopes and serialization
> >>>>> To: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
> >>>>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>>>> Message-ID:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <CACLE=7MUGeq_bgdx0W_hPT-15-9ae_XdD3kab0P3vE4YHftKRg at mail.gmail.com>
> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> in a standard tomcat yes but not in most of embedded ones...and
> that's
> >>>>> not the point anyway
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>> @rmannibucau
> >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2015-02-02 16:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> but you HAVE to manually switch it off. By _default_ the
> serialization
> >>>>>> is on...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Monday, 2 February 2015, 16:42, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>> <rmannibucau at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @Mark: that's not true. 1) you can switch it off + I mainly spoke
> of
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> embedded case where it is true in 80% of cases
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>> @rmannibucau
> >>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2015-02-02 16:38 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Romain, that's not true. Tomcat by default ALWAYS serializes the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> session at shutdown! Even if you don't have a cluster set up. This
> is
> >>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>> required by the Servlets spec...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the
> >>>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> ideas
> >>>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> >>>>> intellectual
> >>>>> property rights inherent in such information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 4
> >>>>> **************************************
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the
> >>>> code
> >>>> under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> ideas
> >>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> >>>> intellectual
> >>>> property rights inherent in such information.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>
> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> >>> code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> >>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual
> >>> property rights inherent in such information.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150203/edcacd93/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list