[cdi-dev] [VOTE] support of implicit bean archive under Java SE

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

I'd be +1 for the param

thats said why not allowing to pass names/regex? j
avax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=myapp-* a bit like EJB modules but
with matching pattern(s)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-06-03 16:14 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>:

> Hi all,
>
>
> Yesterday during the meeting we had a discussion about implicit bean
> archive support under Java SE.
> The idea is to have it disabled by default and provide a way to activate
> it thru parameter "javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=true”on command
> line or in the parameter map of the initialize method.
> Details of the discussion and points of people pro and against this
> support can be found in meeting log :
>
>
> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-dev.2015-06-02-16.01.log.html
>
> I’d like to call for a vote regarding the support of implicit bean archive
> under Java SE.
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hrs. Answer +1 (yes), 0 (don’t care), -1
> (no) to this mail to vote.
>
> Thanks
>
> Antoine
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150603/cb3f1d9e/attachment-0001.html