[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution

[Werner Keil]

I'd say b.

Enforcing the correct behavior via API sounds better than a sentence in the
spec. And makes it easier to keep implementations and applications
compatible.

Werner


On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:03 PM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org> wrote:

> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
>         cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
>    2. Re: [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution (Emily Jiang)
>    3. Re: [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution (Romain Manni-Bucau)
>    4. Re: [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution (Matej Novotny)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:21:04 +0000
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution
> To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CABu-YBSE4gAFtaa8jPLkkcOGpPci0Q3T6smneaAtCO0aC+UQcg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> During yesterday(s meeting we discussed how to solve CDI-616 issue.
> 2 options are possible but we didn't find an agreement, so the best
> solution here would be to vote.
>
> Options are:
>
> a) Do nothing about injection in transient fields (todays behaviour) but
> add a clarification in the spec saying that using them is not supported.
> b) Throw an exception at boot time if a transient field is an injection
> point.
>
> To vote, just answer to this mail with the letter of your vote. Vote will
> last 72 hrs from the hour of this mail.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Antoine
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160803/16192536/attachment-0001.html
>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 69, Issue 3
> **************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160803/899d4dd7/attachment.html