[cdi-dev] Fw: [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution

Mark Struberg struberg at yahoo.de
Wed Aug 3 07:05:03 EDT 2016


a.)




> On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, 13:04, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> > a.)
> 
> 
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, 11:22, Antoine Sabot-Durand 
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> During yesterday(s meeting we discussed how to solve CDI-616 issue.
>> 2 options are possible but we didn't find an agreement, so the best 
> solution here would be to vote.
>> 
>> 
>> Options are:
>> 
>> 
>> a) Do nothing about injection in transient fields (todays behaviour) but add 
> a clarification in the spec saying that using them is not supported.
>> b) Throw an exception at boot time if a transient field is an injection 
> point.
>> 
>> 
>> To vote, just answer to this mail with the letter of your vote. Vote will 
> last 72 hrs from the hour of this mail.
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> 
>> Antoine  
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code 
> under the Apache License, Version 2 
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided 
> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property 
> rights inherent in such information.
>> 
>> 
> 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list