[cdi-dev] Fw: [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution
Mark Struberg
struberg at yahoo.de
Wed Aug 3 07:05:03 EDT 2016
a.)
> On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, 13:04, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> > a.)
>
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Wednesday, 3 August 2016, 11:22, Antoine Sabot-Durand
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> During yesterday(s meeting we discussed how to solve CDI-616 issue.
>> 2 options are possible but we didn't find an agreement, so the best
> solution here would be to vote.
>>
>>
>> Options are:
>>
>>
>> a) Do nothing about injection in transient fields (todays behaviour) but add
> a clarification in the spec saying that using them is not supported.
>> b) Throw an exception at boot time if a transient field is an injection
> point.
>>
>>
>> To vote, just answer to this mail with the letter of your vote. Vote will
> last 72 hrs from the hour of this mail.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>
>> Antoine
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
> under the Apache License, Version 2
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided
> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property
> rights inherent in such information.
>>
>>
>
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list