[cdi-dev] New version for CDI bootstrap

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Hi guys,

I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting.

I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) :

- Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE support in
a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a better package name at
a higher level

- Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer  would be
better. WDYT ?

Antoine

[1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160620/19a5b42d/attachment.html