[cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting

John D. Ament john.d.ament at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 17:04:45 EDT 2016


If we're going to do Friday, I need to know by EOD (business) CET tomorrow.

John

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> I can do Friday but not Monday. In the meanwhile, I'll go through the code
> changes to add any comments I have.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From:        Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com>
> To:        cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>,
> Date:        21/06/2016 16:33
> Subject:        Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
> Sent by:        cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> As I don't have audio where I am during the day, only Friday (when I leave
> earlier in most cases) would work for me.
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <*cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org*
> <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org>> wrote:
> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
>         *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         *cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org*
> <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         *cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
>    2. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (John D. Ament)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:13:54 +0000
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <*antoine at sabot-durand.net*
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net>>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
> To: "John D. Ament" <*john.d.ament at gmail.com* <john.d.ament at gmail.com>>,
> Martin Kouba
>         <*mkouba at redhat.com* <mkouba at redhat.com>>,    Mark Struberg <
> *struberg at yahoo.de* <struberg at yahoo.de>>
> Cc: cdi-dev <*cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> Message-ID:
>         <CABu-YBQL7c_BUkBuZztSvnL4yrih4k5Vtvbz_-jf1K=
> *z1n2gjQ at mail.gmail.com* <z1n2gjQ at mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> I can do both but prefer Monday.
>
> What is your choice?
>
> Antoine
>
> Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <*john.d.ament at gmail.com*
> <john.d.ament at gmail.com>> a
> ?crit :
>
> > I just went through the PR one more time.  It seems like these are the
> > areas of open discussion still:
> >
> > - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided.  I'm in
> > agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
> > - Disassociating the thread model and the context model.  This is the
> > first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
> > any concerns with that change.
> > - The fact that contexts have IDs.  To me it makes sense, but it seems
> > like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to make
> > sure we can bridge from existing)
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <*mkouba at redhat.com*
> <mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
> >>
> >> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
> >> presence is not required.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
> now
> >> > is the only day I have open.
> >> >
> >> > What about next week? Monday?
> >> >
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <*mkouba at redhat.com*
> <mkouba at redhat.com>
> >> > <mailto:*mkouba at redhat.com* <mkouba at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >     Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
> >> >
> >> >     I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
> >> >
> >> >     What I particularly dislike:
> >> >     * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
> >> >     * the concept of the context id
> >> >     * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
> >> method/class
> >> >     for each supported scope)
> >> >
> >> >     Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll find
> >> out
> >> >     that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
> >> believe we
> >> >     will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
> >> complex
> >> >     API (without sacrificing correctness).
> >> >
> >> >     Martin
> >> >
> >> >     [1]
> >> >
> >>
> *http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts*
> <http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> >> >      > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
> >> >      > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
> >> >      >
> >> >      > LieGrue,
> >> >      > strub
> >> >      >
> >> >      >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >> >     <*antoine at sabot-durand.net* <antoine at sabot-durand.net> <mailto:
> *antoine at sabot-durand.net* <antoine at sabot-durand.net>>>:
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> Hi all,
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
> >> >     proposal regarding CDI-30:
> >> >      >> *https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291*
> <https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291>
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
> >> >     this week.
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> Antoine
> >> >      >> _______________________________________________
> >> >      >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >> >      >> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >> >      >> *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >> >      >>
> >> >      >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> >      >
> >> >      >
> >> >      > _______________________________________________
> >> >      > cdi-dev mailing list
> >> >      > *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >> >      > *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >> >      >
> >> >      > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> >      >
> >> >
> >> >     --
> >> >     Martin Kouba
> >> >     Software Engineer
> >> >     Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >> >     _______________________________________________
> >> >     cdi-dev mailing list
> >> >     *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >> >     *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >> >
> >> >     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> licenses
> >> >     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Kouba
> >> Software Engineer
> >> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> *http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c30cfd7d/attachment-0001.html*
> <http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c30cfd7d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:16:23 -0400
> From: "John D. Ament" <*john.d.ament at gmail.com* <john.d.ament at gmail.com>>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
> To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <*antoine at sabot-durand.net*
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net>>
> Cc: *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> *CAOqetn_3uk-WxjhT438TFueB3_fYnXQfmw+NHpFrZ2BZ3ZJBXw at mail.gmail.com*
> <CAOqetn_3uk-WxjhT438TFueB3_fYnXQfmw%2BNHpFrZ2BZ3ZJBXw at mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Monday is better for me but I can do both.
> On Jun 21, 2016 11:14, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <*antoine at sabot-durand.net*
> <antoine at sabot-durand.net>>
> wrote:
>
> > So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> > meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> > I can do both but prefer Monday.
> >
> > What is your choice?
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <*john.d.ament at gmail.com*
> <john.d.ament at gmail.com>> a
> > ?crit :
> >
> >> I just went through the PR one more time.  It seems like these are the
> >> areas of open discussion still:
> >>
> >> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided.  I'm in
> >> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
> >> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model.  This is the
> >> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
> >> any concerns with that change.
> >> - The fact that contexts have IDs.  To me it makes sense, but it seems
> >> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to
> make
> >> sure we can bridge from existing)
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <*mkouba at redhat.com*
> <mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
> >>>
> >>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
> >>> presence is not required.
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
> >>> now
> >>> > is the only day I have open.
> >>> >
> >>> > What about next week? Monday?
> >>> >
> >>> > John
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <*mkouba at redhat.com*
> <mkouba at redhat.com>
> >>> > <mailto:*mkouba at redhat.com* <mkouba at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
> >>> >
> >>> >     I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
> >>> >
> >>> >     What I particularly dislike:
> >>> >     * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
> >>> >     * the concept of the context id
> >>> >     * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
> >>> method/class
> >>> >     for each supported scope)
> >>> >
> >>> >     Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll
> find
> >>> out
> >>> >     that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
> >>> believe we
> >>> >     will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
> >>> complex
> >>> >     API (without sacrificing correctness).
> >>> >
> >>> >     Martin
> >>> >
> >>> >     [1]
> >>> >
> >>>
> *http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts*
> <http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >     Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> >>> >      > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
> >>> >      > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
> >>> >      >
> >>> >      > LieGrue,
> >>> >      > strub
> >>> >      >
> >>> >      >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >>> >     <*antoine at sabot-durand.net* <antoine at sabot-durand.net> <mailto:
> *antoine at sabot-durand.net* <antoine at sabot-durand.net>>>:
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> Hi all,
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
> >>> >     proposal regarding CDI-30:
> >>> >      >> *https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291*
> <https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291>
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
> >>> >     this week.
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> Antoine
> >>> >      >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >      >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> >      >> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >>> >      >> *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >>> >      >>
> >>> >      >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> >      >
> >>> >      >
> >>> >      > _______________________________________________
> >>> >      > cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> >      > *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >>> >      > *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >>> >      >
> >>> >      > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> >      >
> >>> >
> >>> >     --
> >>> >     Martin Kouba
> >>> >     Software Engineer
> >>> >     Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>> >     _______________________________________________
> >>> >     cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> >     *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >>> >     *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >>> >
> >>> >     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> licenses
> >>> >     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> >     (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other
> >>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Martin Kouba
> >>> Software Engineer
> >>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>>
> >>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> *http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/attachment.html*
> <http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>).  For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 12
> ***************************************
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/29a93986/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list