[cdi-dev] Accelerate decision process and PR adoption / rejection

[John D. Ament]

Antoine,

Why do only some EG members have access to merge PRs?
On May 3, 2016 9:44 AM, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> As you know we plan to release CDI 2.0 before the end of January. It let's
> us around 6 months to complete the spec.
>
> I think we really should find a way to enhance our focus on reviewing
> proposal and code.
> Adding special Hangout meetings proved itself a good solution to go that
> way, but I think we should also work on rules adoption for PR.
>
> So I propose that:
> - PR should stay open at least one week.
> - It could be merged (after at least a week) if 4 EG members votes for it
> (+1 on the PR).
> - As no one is error proof if someone has an objection to a PR to be
> merged he could raise his concern and justify his objection.
> - The following discussion should lead either to a revision of the PR or a
> +1 from the objector
> - If no agreement is reached, to avoid blocage a vote will be called on
> this ML to adopt or reject the PR.
>
> I'm not a big fan of over processed team work, but we really have to
> deliver.
> For the moment I think we can avoid having too much process on ticket
> choice (we don't have enough contributors to go that way)
>
> Wdyt ?
>
> Antoine
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160503/a8a3f151/attachment.html