[forge-dev] Forge'in ahead with JBoss Tools

Burr Sutter bsutter at redhat.com
Wed Apr 4 12:13:36 EDT 2012

Well let's just say it is up for future discussion :-)

In one set of meetings I referred to "drag car" and "formula 1" - we need to provide both - getting started and staying the crooked course.  

Perhaps that is not all Forge+plug-ins...but it is something I want to keep thinking about.

F1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97rrME9eQHA
Drag - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDP7Pty8Qnw

On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Keith Babo wrote:

> On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> One thing I was planning on discussing with Lincoln and the Forge roadmap is around the idea of "Forge as a 4GL" - at the moment it feels mostly like a static code generator - which has the problem of schema changes.   But Forge as a 4GL could be more responsive, almost "runtime" code generation.  More like what you get in the Rails world.  :-)
>> This is exactly where I hope  Forge will *not* go.
> Yep.  I like Forge a lot for getting up and going.  It's quite good at that and there's a clear need for it.  IMHO, Forge as a 4GL would be really tough to pull off and would take users' attention off of what Forge is best at.  
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120404/db841766/attachment.html 

More information about the forge-dev mailing list