[forge-dev] EPL header required?

[Dan Allen]

Lincoln is a big fan of simple :)

As always, thanks for the prompt and insightful response!

-Dan

--
Sent from my CyanogenMod-powered
Android device, an open platform for
carriers, developers and consumers.
On Aug 8, 2012 6:10 PM, "Richard Fontana" <rfontana at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:01:54PM -0400, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> > Hey Richard, Max,
> >
> > Do you know what type of tasks we need to complete in order to be
> "correctly
> > licensed" under the EPL?
> >
> > Such as:
> >
> >  1. Include LICENSE file in base of project and deliverable archives.
>
> Yes.
>
> >  2. Include license header in all source files
>
> Good idea. I've never liked the IBM/Eclipse-style license notices
> (probably what Max is using :) and recently recommended this to
> Galder:
>
>  Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
>
>  Licensed under the Eclipse Public License version 1.0, available at
>  http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
>
> I'd say use something as simple as that.
>
>  - Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120809/46bc7a6b/attachment.html