[forge-dev] EPL header required?

[Max Andersen]

I'm all for simple too - the full header is the minimal version red hat legal commissioned ~5 years ago.

Time does seem to fix things :)

Sent from a mobile device

On 08/08/2012, at 23.25, Richard Fontana <rfontana at redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:01:54PM -0400, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>> Hey Richard, Max,
>> 
>> Do you know what type of tasks we need to complete in order to be "correctly
>> licensed" under the EPL?
>> 
>> Such as:
>> 
>> 1. Include LICENSE file in base of project and deliverable archives.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 2. Include license header in all source files
> 
> Good idea. I've never liked the IBM/Eclipse-style license notices
> (probably what Max is using :) and recently recommended this to
> Galder:
> 
> Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
> 
> Licensed under the Eclipse Public License version 1.0, available at
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
> 
> I'd say use something as simple as that.
> 
> - Richard
>