[forge-dev] Fully qualified classes within annotations?

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 12:41:49 EST 2012


Hey Richard,

There is a method in JavaSource called resolveType(); This method will
return the fully qualified type of the given Class name; however, there is
a big issue here at the moment. We cannot resolve wildcards, or classes
from the same package that are in the 'package' visibility scope.

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-424

In these two cases, resolveType() will actually return the class name
unchanged, which is your signal to take desperate measures, because I don't
think that we will be fixing this in time for .Final. In the case of
Column.class, I would start by assuming that the class is what you expect,
and in the case of other unknown types, at this point - unfortunately -
it's going to be up to you to figure out what that type is, and if
reasonable assumptions can be made.

Sorry about this, I know it's a big gap, but it's going to take a lot of
work to fix this as you might be able to see in the issue. But definitely
call resolveType() as a first step, then you'll have to "worry" about
handling potential issues where the type information is not available.

We also can't tell if a Class literal is a class, interface, enum, etc...

~Lincoln

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Richard Kennard <
richard at kennardconsulting.com> wrote:

> Lincoln,
>
> As you may recall, the new 'static Metawidget' scaffolding tries to reuse
> Inspectors between the runtime/static worlds. To do this, it needs to reify
> the
> annotations from org.jboss.forge.parser.java.Annotations into 'proper'
> java.lang.annotation.Annotations.
>
> This is mostly working, but I am struggling with reifying two things:
>
> 1. If the annotation's value is a Class
> 2. If the annotation's value is another annotation
>
> The problem is the same in both cases - I am lacking the qualified name of
> the class/annotation. If they user enters:
>
>     @MyAnnotation( Column.class )
>
> Then I need to know that it's actually a javax.persistence.Column.class.
> This is a bit beyond me! I have left a couple of TODOs in
> ForgePropertyStyle and
> in ForgePropertyStyleTest. Could you take a look?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard.
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120113/1e96901f/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list