[forge-dev] Interesting in doing GSOC 2013 with Forge

ggastald at redhat.com ggastald at redhat.com
Mon Apr 8 13:13:56 EDT 2013

Awesome Shameera!

I'd say that either are priority. We had another one that is too add 
support for IntelliJ/Netbeans in Forge 2.0.
I'd recommend you to be familiar with Forge by reading the 
docs/tutorials in http://forge.jboss.org as well as reading the source code.

You can meet us in #forge in irc.freenode.net too.

Best Regards,

George Gastaldi

On 04/06/2013 02:35 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka wrote:
> Hi devs,
> I have successfully done my 2012 GSOC with Apache Axis2[1], I am 
> interesting in doing this time with JBOSS, I checked idea list 
> published in GSOC13 idea list[2]. I would like to know more about two 
> projects proposed with Forge[3][4]. Which proposal has more priority 
> over other, and what are the area i need to look at( definitely i have 
> to play with forge to be familiar) in that proposal?
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
> [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-5270
> [2] https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GSOC13Ideas
> [3] 
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GSOC13Ideas#Implement_a_Database_Migration_system_as_plugin_for_Forge
> [4https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GSOC13Ideas#Support_for_the_Gradle_build_system_as_a_plugin_for_Forge]
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

*George Gastaldi* | /Senior Software Engineer/
JBoss Forge Team
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20130408/c01de42f/attachment.html 

More information about the forge-dev mailing list