[forge-dev] [aerogear-dev] Aerogear.js for CRUD

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 11:14:29 EST 2013

I'm a little confused. Is this a bug in the Forge scaffolding, or a new
requirement because of the upgrade to jQuery 1.9 in the AeroGear client?
The Forge scaffolding seems to work fine. Is this something that prevents
the current forge scaffolding or REST endpoints from working correctly, or
only when paired with something from Aerogear? Is this something that
exists and can be tried? Just curious because I'd like to know if we broke
something, or missed a requirement.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:

> It sounds like, at a minimum, we have a bug in the Forge scaffolding to
> support Aerogear.js
> My next concern would be that since this "feature" was introduced with
> jQuery 1.9, it could be that a LOT of the world's REST endpoints are no
> longer POST compatible with Aerogear.js, nothing to be done about that
> except to document it well for Aerogear.js when the time to promote it
> heavily comes up.
> Aerogear.js doc issues also include confusion of datamanager/store
> (getting started guide is not clear for when those are needed) and the
> seemingly missing docs for Pipe.  Plus, the first example seen by the
> end-user should include the use of iteration through the results, not an
> underscore template which hides some of the details.
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
> > To my understanding, HTTP 201 should always return created entity and its
> > content should be based on Content-Type header field.
> >
> > See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:25:53 -0500 (EST)
> > Vineet Reynolds Pereira <vpereira at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It would be better to treat this as a flag to be enabled during REST
> resource
> >> scaffolding. It would allow users to choose how the resource behaves -
> >> * send a 201 response with Location header,
> >> * send a 201 response with Location header and also a response entity.
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

Lincoln Baxter, III
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20131218/428cbf6c/attachment.html 

More information about the forge-dev mailing list