[hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10

[Gail Badner]

I've added an issue for backporting HHH-6855. I thought it was a good idea to include HHH-6854 so that the backport for HHH-6855 would be tested.

Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358.

Thanks,
Gail

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve at hibernate.org>
> To: "Gail Badner" <gbadner at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10
> 
> Actually it is not fixed yet :)  Let me think about it.
> 
> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say
> > its
> > not important for backport.
> >
> > I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I
> > may
> > have left that fix version there by mistake.
> >
> > On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
> >> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10.
> >>
> >> Please take a look at:
> >> https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=fixVersion+%3D+%223.6.10%22+AND+project+%3D+HHH
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I
> >> could
> >> be talked into it.
> >>
> >> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be
> >> backported?
> >>
> >> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for
> >> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as
> >> appropriate.
> >>
> >> Feedback?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Gail
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
> >> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >
> 
> --
> steve at hibernate.org
> http://hibernate.org
>