[hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10

[Steve Ebersole]

Just to be clear, the testing fix in HHH-6854 does not affect testing 
for HHH-6855...

On 01/20/2012 01:39 AM, Gail Badner wrote:
> I've added an issue for backporting HHH-6855. I thought it was a good idea to include HHH-6854 so that the backport for HHH-6855 would be tested.
>
> Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358.
>
> Thanks,
> Gail
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Ebersole"<steve at hibernate.org>
>> To: "Gail Badner"<gbadner at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Hibernate"<hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10
>>
>> Actually it is not fixed yet :)  Let me think about it.
>>
>> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say
>>> its
>>> not important for backport.
>>>
>>> I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I
>>> may
>>> have left that fix version there by mistake.
>>>
>>> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
>>>> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10.
>>>>
>>>> Please take a look at:
>>>> https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=fixVersion+%3D+%223.6.10%22+AND+project+%3D+HHH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I
>>>> could
>>>> be talked into it.
>>>>
>>>> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be
>>>> backported?
>>>>
>>>> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for
>>>> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as
>>>> appropriate.
>>>>
>>>> Feedback?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gail
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> steve at hibernate.org
>> http://hibernate.org
>>

-- 
steve at hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org