[hibernate-dev] [HSEARCH] New additional repository

[Sanne Grinovero]

Personally I use OpenJDK most of the time, but I definitely need Oracle's
one as well for testing.. that's indeed the same purpose here.

To clarify: we're testing against AS 7.2, not EAP, so no strings attached.
It just so happens it was uploaded to this other repository and not the
usual one; also this looks like a temporary solution as we expect future
versions of AS (name?) to be uploaded to the usual places.

To be fair even if it was EAP I would like to test against it, I don't see
why not as long as it's practical, but that's not the case yet.

It would be even better if no settings.xml was needed at all, but since you
already need the jboss.org one, this isn't much of a difference in terms of
practicality.

Sanne



On 3 April 2013 16:19, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:

> On Wed 2013-04-03 16:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >
> > On 3 Jan 2013, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to
> either run
> > >>>
> > >>>   mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
> > >>>
> > >>> or add in your settings.xml the profile and associated repository
> redhat-earlyaccess-repository
> > >>> and add it to the list of active profiles. settings-example.xml will
> > >>> show you everything.
> > >>
> > >> I am not a big fan of this. I don't understand why we need to source
> artefacts from there. :-(
> > >
> > > Where do you want them from? The sky ;)
> > > A maven repo is a maven repo is a maven repo. I see no difference
> > > between the JBoss community repo, the Red Hat platform repo and any
> > > other third-party repo we depend on for that matters.
> >
> > I do. I think there is a difference between a community repo and a Red
> Hat platform repo.
> > We as a community project should depend/use the former.
> >
>
> I don't see the technical nor ideological merit of your position. Both
> are open source and even if it was not, I see no reason to depend on non
> open bits for test integration purposes. I wish we had the ability to do
> that for WAS, Weblogic etc at the time when they changed their
> transaction manager internals every full moon.
>
> After all, you use Oracle's JVM most of the time and not OpenJDK.
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>