[hibernate-dev] Relaxing the pull request review requirement
Scott Marlow
smarlow at redhat.com
Thu May 2 10:10:33 EDT 2013
The downside of waiting for a pull request to be merged by someone else
is that it can take away some of the fun of contributing.
Sometimes, I think sequentially and having to wait for a pull request to
be merged can hurt my flow. I'm speaking from my experience with
non-Hibernate Search projects since I haven't submitted any patches to
Search. ;)
With Hibernate ORM, I am happy being able to decide myself, whether to
push a change or create a pull request for someone else to look at
first. I like the ORM model better.
On 05/01/2013 12:12 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> We have been generally very strict in requiring any code change to be
> reviewed by someone else;
> I still believe this has many benefits, but also it brings
> occasionally to painfully slow integrations for trivial fixed.
>
> Since we have a bot now automatically verifying changes, I think this
> rule should be relaxed a bit; still highly recommended to wait for
> someone else to merge it, but I'd propose that if you're confident it
> is simple enough, the review done by the bot should be considered good
> enough.
>
> I just self-merged :
> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-search/pull/406
>
> hope you all agree that waiting for feedback was unnecessary?
>
> Of course this should be used very sparingly, also considering that
> even if you think it's correct and simple enough someone might not
> agree with the change, and rises the committer's responsibility to the
> highest level.
>
> Sanne
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
More information about the hibernate-dev
mailing list