[hibernate-dev] [OGM] The (new) remote Hot-Rod based Infinispan GridDialect

[Gunnar Morling]

Does it have to be a separate module to begin with?

For MongoDB - which contains two datastore providers (MongoDB, Fongo)
and Redis - which also will have two different dialects as per Mark's
pending PR - it's one module.

We should stick to one pattern, and having one module seems easier on
the user to me. So unless you see a strong advantage for two modules
I'd say let's use one.

Regarding the provider names, "infinispan" and "infinspan-remote" seem
good. If you think remote will be more common eventually, we may
rename the current one and have "infinispan-embedded" and
"infinispan". Requires a change to existing users, but it seems
acceptable to do in 5.

I would not have "hotrod" in the name, this is a technicality I'd
prefer to not expose at this level. Rather "remote" vs. "embedded"
which will be stable also if specific protocols change.

--Gunnar


2015-12-14 18:57 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>:
> Hello all,
>    while creating the basic scaffolding for the new GridDialect, I
> called the new Maven module "hibernate-ogm-infinispan-hotrod". Which
> is rather long, but descriptive.
>
> Q1: any better name?
>
>
>    The current one which we have working on Infinispan "embedded mode"
> is named "hibernate-ogm-infinispan".
>
> Q2: do we need to rename the existing one? If not, what to we call it
> in our documentation to disambiguate?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev