[hibernate-dev] Blog tag vs categories

[Davide D'Alto]

It seems that "Off-topic" and  "Off topic" are basically the same tag, they
both point to:
http://in.relation.to/off-topic/index.html

It's probably a bug in the tag cloud generation

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Davide D'Alto <daltodavide at gmail.com>
wrote:

> > I'm ok to remove it, but I don't buy that reason: it sounds more like a
> technical limitation than something which should affect our capability to
> produce good content.
>
> The lack of validation of the tags is a technical limitation, and should
> not be too hard to add,
> keeping the words in the cloud limited is a usability aspect.
> Would you also add Neo4j, CouchDB, Redis and so on for OGM?
>
> It's OK for me if we want to extend the number of keywords in the tag
> cloud, but I don't think
> it's a good idea to make it possible to add new keyword each time.
>
> > BTW, Davide, I've seen "Off topic" and "Off-topic" I could not find the
> one
> mapped "Off topic", I don't know if you have an idea how to.
>
> I'll check
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon 2016-03-21 14:26, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> > On 21 March 2016 at 14:10, Davide D'Alto <daltodavide at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > The problem with having many tags is that you will have a huge tag
>> cloud
>> > > with just a few words more visible than the others.
>> > > This was the case before we did some clean up. In our case it also
>> becomes
>> > > hard to keep track of the tags we already used
>> > > with the result of several duplicates.
>> >
>> > I'm ok to remove it, but I don't buy that reason: it sounds more like
>> > a technical limitation than something which should affect our
>> > capability to produce good content.
>>
>> Davide and I did all the clean up work last time. We would prefer not
>> have to do it again. The previous tag cloud was useless. The current one
>> is already pretty crowded to be honest.
>>
>> BTW, Davide, I've seen "Off topic" and "Off-topic" I could not find the
>> one
>> mapped "Off topic", I don't know if you have an idea how to.
>>
>
>