[hibernate-dev] HHH-9329

[Christian Beikov]

Well to be fair, I already reported that this "regression" was 
introduced in 4.2.8 by placing the ON predicate on the target table join 
instead of the collection table join as was done before in 4.2.7.SP1.
I am not using 4.x anymore but since Wildfly ships with Hibernate 5.0, I 
suppose that others could benefit from this too.
Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan fixed yet? I didn't 
consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.


Regards,
Christian

Am 22.09.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Gail Badner:
> Hi Christian,
>
> We are only backporting critical issues and regressions to 5.0 at this 
> point, so it can't be backported to 5.0. If no regressions caused by 
> this fix are reported in 5.2, I would consider backporting to 5.1.
>
> Regards,
> Gail
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christian Beikov 
> <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, I know that it's a beauty ^^
>     Hope this can get into all 5.x branches?
>
>     Regards,
>     Christian
>     Am 20.09.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
>     > I took a quick look.  I'd prefer to see better solution as we
>     migrate
>     > to SQM; but for 5.x, given how Hibernate generates SQL there, I
>     am not
>     > sure how else you would possibly do this
>     >
>     >
>     > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:54 PM Vlad Mihalcea
>     > <mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>>>
>     wrote:
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >
>     >     I'm going to review it tomorrow.
>     >
>     >     Vlad
>     >
>     >     On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Christian Beikov <
>     >christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     > Hey again,
>     >     >
>     >     > I implemented the approach that I proposed in the issue and a
>     >     test in
>     >     > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561
>     <https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561>
>     >     >
>     >     > It detects left joins with join tables that use the target
>     table
>     >     alias.
>     >     > The join table is replaced with a subquery and the WITH clause
>     >     is moved
>     >     > to the join of the subquery.
>     >     >
>     >     > Any comments?
>     >     >
>     >     > Regards,
>     >     > Christian
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > hibernate-dev mailing list
>     >     > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     >     >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>     >     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     hibernate-dev mailing list
>     > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     hibernate-dev mailing list
>     hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>
>