[hibernate-dev] HHH-9329

[Christian Beikov]

Wrong thread?

Am 23.09.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> There are some conceptual mismatch problem that IMO stem from the L2C 
> SPI.  We are discussing that all as part of 
> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10707
>
> Whether that affects you really depends how you configure caching.  If 
> you try to reuse regions for different types of data (entity, 
> collection, etc) then it will affect you.  If you define different 
> access strategies for the same region then it will affect you.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:02 AM Christian Beikov 
> <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Well to be fair, I already reported that this "regression" was
>     introduced in 4.2.8 by placing the ON predicate on the target
>     table join
>     instead of the collection table join as was done before in 4.2.7.SP1.
>     I am not using 4.x anymore but since Wildfly ships with Hibernate
>     5.0, I
>     suppose that others could benefit from this too.
>     Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan fixed yet? I
>     didn't
>     consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.
>
>
>     Regards,
>     Christian
>
>     Am 22.09.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Gail Badner:
>     > Hi Christian,
>     >
>     > We are only backporting critical issues and regressions to 5.0
>     at this
>     > point, so it can't be backported to 5.0. If no regressions caused by
>     > this fix are reported in 5.2, I would consider backporting to 5.1.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Gail
>     >
>     > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christian Beikov
>     > <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Thanks, I know that it's a beauty ^^
>     >     Hope this can get into all 5.x branches?
>     >
>     >     Regards,
>     >     Christian
>     >     Am 20.09.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
>     >     > I took a quick look.  I'd prefer to see better solution as we
>     >     migrate
>     >     > to SQM; but for 5.x, given how Hibernate generates SQL
>     there, I
>     >     am not
>     >     > sure how else you would possibly do this
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:54 PM Vlad Mihalcea
>     >     > <mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>>
>     >     <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>>>>
>     >     wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     Thanks,
>     >     >
>     >     >     I'm going to review it tomorrow.
>     >     >
>     >     >     Vlad
>     >     >
>     >     >     On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Christian Beikov <
>     >     >christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>
>     >     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>     >     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>     <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     > Hey again,
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > I implemented the approach that I proposed in the
>     issue and a
>     >     >     test in
>     >     >     > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561
>     >     <https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561>
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > It detects left joins with join tables that use the
>     target
>     >     table
>     >     >     alias.
>     >     >     > The join table is replaced with a subquery and the
>     WITH clause
>     >     >     is moved
>     >     >     > to the join of the subquery.
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Any comments?
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Regards,
>     >     >     > Christian
>     >     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     >     > hibernate-dev mailing list
>     >     >     > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>>
>     >     >     >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     >     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>     >     >     >
>     >     >  _______________________________________________
>     >     >     hibernate-dev mailing list
>     >     > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     >     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>>
>     >     > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     >     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     hibernate-dev mailing list
>     > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>     <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>     > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>     >     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     hibernate-dev mailing list
>     hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>