[hibernate-dev] 6.0 Alpha1 prep
Sanne Grinovero
sanne at hibernate.org
Wed Dec 5 16:49:03 EST 2018
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:10, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> Another one..
>
> `hibernate-orm-modules` defines a `hibernate-envers` module (in the WF
> modules sense). Since envers is now part of `hibernate-core` should we
> remove that module or have it just act as an alias for the main orm module?
Removal is fine. The `hibernate-envers` dedicated module was just new,
it never made it in any WF release.
Also, when it comes to WF modules, the WF team can easily add
additional backwards compatibility aliases - that's in their control.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:54 AM Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> > One other artifact note...
> >
> > `hibernate-envers` has been merged into `hibernate-core` as of 6. Should
> > we just drop this one since this is a new major release? Or do the
> > relocation for a few?
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:42 AM Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> >
> >> As I am preparing the Alpha1 release a few topics of discussion have come
> >> up...
> >>
> >> Previously (last year's f2f) we had decided to unify the artifact naming
> >> conventions; specifically for ORM this meant renaming the groupId from
> >> `org.hibernate` to `org.hibernate.orm` as part of 6.0. I wanted to see if
> >> everyone still agrees with this.
> >>
> >> There are a few artifacts we need to decide how to handle:
> >>
> >> - `hibernate-entitymanager` and `hibernate-java8` have been part of
> >> `hibernate-core` since 5.2 (I thought moving `hibernate-entitymanager`
> >> happened way earlier, but seems like not). Should we drop these? They
> >> have been defined as relocations for quite some time now).
> >> - `hibernate-ehcache` defines support for using Ehcache 2 as a
> >> second-level cache, which is a version the Ehcache team does not even
> >> support anymore and have not for quite a few years. Ehcache 3 is a JCache
> >> compliant version and the way that the Ehcache team prefer to handle the
> >> integration (in fact they wrote most of `hibernate-jcache`). IMO this
> >> should be removed as well. Thoughts?
> >> - `hibernate-infinispan` - support for using Infinispan as a
> >> Hibernate L2C has been moved to the Infinispan project. Again, IMO this
> >> module should go away. Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrea, Chris.. anything you can think of that I missed?
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
More information about the hibernate-dev
mailing list