[infinispan-dev] Module configuration proposal

[Manik Surtani]

Well, it's hardly public API. It isn't even SPI, it's in between an  
internal interface and an SPI. :) so I'm not that concerned. No one  
really should be using this interface except us.

Sent from my iPhone

On 5 Nov 2009, at 09:29, Galder Zamarreno <galder at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/04/2009 08:56 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> TBH ISPN-193 and ISPN-245 need not be joined at the hip. We could go
>> with 193 now since you already have it, and then 245 after GA. Or,
>> time permitting, I could implement 245 at some point next week maybe
>> and that could be rolled into the GA too, let's see, but it shouldn't
>> be a blocker for GA.
>
> I'd wait for 245 till 4.1 cos it's better if we give ourselves time to
> provide implementations for the interface so that we can nail it down.
> For example, I do wanna implement a ModuleLifecycle for tree module.
>
> If we get something wrong in the interface now and we commit it for  
> 4.0,
> it's gonna be tough to change it afterwards.
>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 4 Nov 2009, at 19:43, Vladimir Blagojevic<vblagoje at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09-11-04 1:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> It's not that I anticipate changes, it's more a case of introducing
>>>> major changes in a late-stage CR.  :)  Then again, we've already  
>>>> done
>>>> that with ISPN-251, etc...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> My gut feeling is that we go forward and implement this feature, I
>>> think
>>> it is worth it. As soon as 4.0 is out everybody out there can write
>>> their extension modules, experiment with extending Infinispan and so
>>> on.
>>> We use query module as our test bunny and a guidance to others how  
>>> to
>>> extend Infinispan! For a little GA delay we get a big payoff. I  
>>> doubt
>>> that we are going to introduce some major instability. I've already
>>> implemented module configuration loading, just have to convert it to
>>> look for this property file. The change is not major, and ISPN-245
>>> does
>>> not look too hard. Maybe you can take ISPN-245? You could do it in a
>>> day
>>> or so since you are familiar with that code inside out....
>>>
>>> What does everyone else think?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> -- 
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev