[infinispan-dev] Using Dummy VS JBossTM for running tests
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
Mon Feb 28 12:28:06 EST 2011
On 28 Feb 2011, at 17:24, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 28 Feb 2011, at 17:21, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Feb 2011, at 16:37, Jonathan Halliday wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That's actually going to change your test semantics slightly. You may
>>> want to run in both optimized and non-optimized modes to ensure full
>>> coverage - some code paths may not get exercised in one or the other case.
>>
>> Right; we actually DO want to test a full 2PC cycle. So we should disable any such optimisations.
> Both scenarios are equally important iMO, as I'd expect TM to use this optimisation.
Fair comment. Then we should set up Hudson to have 2 runs - one with and one without. Hudson needs to be our definitive source of whether something is broken or not, and running tests locally this behaviour can be controlled with a flag.
Cheers
Manik
--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list