[infinispan-dev] Comments on tutorials etc.

[Mircea Markus]

On 19 Jan 2011, at 15:11, Galder Zamarreño wrote:

> 
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> 
>>> On 18 Jan 2011, at 16:17, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 12) http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala
>>>> 
>>>> For "Cache with Transaction Management" I was not seeing TX semantics being obeyed, I saw the size increment as a added key-value pairs
which cache operation?
I imagine the size only increments within the transaction context? i.e. if you suspend the uncommitted transaction and run the same operation again, you don't see transaction's modifications.  
>>> 
>>> Galder, this as well?
>> 
>> I'll check it out.
> 
> I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882 - This behaviour is like this since since we accepted (Mircea?) the following community bug report: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679
> 
> Can we get an agreement on this? I think it should work as it did originally.
You mean cache.values()? should not be tx aware? I think it should be consistent with all the other ops, like put, get etc. (which are tx aware).


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20110119/60bdd1f6/attachment.html