[infinispan-dev] benchmarking 5.1 vs 5.0

[Slorg1]

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action.
>>
>> Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches:
>>
>> 1. non transactional: web session replication[1]
>> 2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2]
>> 3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3]
>>
>> The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions.
>>
>> Any other suggestion for benchmarking?
>
> Could it be interesting to see what the autoCommit penalty is? i.e. comparing: non-transactional cache vs transactional cache with autoCommit


Pure Transactional and autoCommit 'off' does not work in BETA 5. I am
compiling a list of changes I made to make it happen.

To save you the trouble of going through what I did and give you a
solution that 'works'.

Regards,

L.P.

-- 
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email ?