[infinispan-dev] benchmarking 5.1 vs 5.0

[Mircea Markus]

On 29 Nov 2011, at 14:03, Slorg1 wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action.
>>> 
>>> Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches:
>>> 
>>> 1. non transactional: web session replication[1]
>>> 2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2]
>>> 3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3]
>>> 
>>> The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions.
>>> 
>>> Any other suggestion for benchmarking?
>> 
>> Could it be interesting to see what the autoCommit penalty is? i.e. comparing: non-transactional cache vs transactional cache with autoCommit
> 
> 
> Pure Transactional and autoCommit 'off' does not work in BETA 5. I am
> compiling a list of changes I made to make it happen.
> 
> To save you the trouble of going through what I did and give you a
> solution that 'works'.
What do you mean by do not work? 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20111129/53726f54/attachment.html