[infinispan-dev] Once again, default executor configuration letting us down

Eduardo Martins emmartins at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 06:43:58 EST 2012


IMHO It doesn't make much sense to stretch to 200 threads for anything at
all, it's overkill...

-- Eduardo
..............................................
http://emmartins.blogspot.com



On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Bela Ban <bban at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1000.
>
> Still, he's only getting a marginal performance improvement, so IMO we
> should take his test and run it ourselves against ehcache.
>
> His test is actually not bad, as he's doing a few puts, gets and
> removes, so it mimics a real app...
>
>
> On 3/1/12 12:14 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Re: https://community.jboss.org/message/720598#720598
> >
> > This shows once again that we need to address
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1441 asap cos it makes look weak out
> of the box when people try to run performance tests like this.
> >
> > We should bring this forward to 5.2
>
>
> --
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups (http://www.jgroups.org)
> JBoss / Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120301/e2086d50/attachment.html 


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list