[infinispan-dev] TotalOrder and jgroups

[Bela Ban]

On 3/6/12 3:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

>> Is this something similar to the shared transport [1] ? I'm not sure but
>> AFAIK the AS already uses a shared transport. Is what you suggest above
>> similar to a shared transport ?
>
> Ha yes that looks like perfect!
> But looking at the diagram, wouldn't it be useful to have those stacks
> share PING, MERGE2 and FD ?
>
> Taking a step further (and getting back to the topic), why not share
> the full stack up to SEQUENCER or COUNTER,
> so that we have two "virtual" channels but not having the two affect each other?

On the todo list: [1], [2], [3]... It's not as trivial as it sounds 
though...

[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-844
[2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-790
[3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-640


-- 
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups (http://www.jgroups.org)
JBoss / Red Hat