[infinispan-dev] TotalOrder and jgroups

[Sanne Grinovero]

On 6 March 2012 14:30, Bela Ban <bban at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/6/12 3:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>>> Is this something similar to the shared transport [1] ? I'm not sure but
>>> AFAIK the AS already uses a shared transport. Is what you suggest above
>>> similar to a shared transport ?
>>
>> Ha yes that looks like perfect!
>> But looking at the diagram, wouldn't it be useful to have those stacks
>> share PING, MERGE2 and FD ?
>>
>> Taking a step further (and getting back to the topic), why not share
>> the full stack up to SEQUENCER or COUNTER,
>> so that we have two "virtual" channels but not having the two affect each other?
>
> On the todo list: [1], [2], [3]... It's not as trivial as it sounds
> though...
>
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-844
> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-790
> [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-640

Great, thanks! In the meantime, do you think it would make sense to
hardcode NO_TOTAL_ORDER flag in COUNTER usage ?

-- Sanne