[infinispan-dev] An observation about total order and consistency

Pedro Ruivo pruivo at gsd.inesc-id.pt
Wed Mar 7 13:49:30 EST 2012


BTW, the results posted, both configurations had the flag 
syncCommit/RollbackPhase set to false.

On 3/7/12 1:41 PM, Paolo Romano wrote:
> I did not know about this change, thanks for pointing it out! By the
> way, is it still possible to send commit messages asynchronously with
> 2PC by changing the default config? I am asking as, in order to ensure
> fairness when comparing the performance of the two protocols, it would
> be better to make sure that they enforce the same semantic.
>
> Another possibility would be to extend the TOB-based replication
> mechanism to support this semantic. Conceptually, this is not too
> complicated, but coding that will still take some time... and I  would
> prefer to invest effort on TOM+partial replication. What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
>
>       Paolo
>
> On 3/7/12 1:17 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>>> if I recall correctly currently (with 2PC)  the commit is sent
>>> asynchronously (without waiting to gather acks).
>> The commit used to be send async (default) before 5.2, but now it is sent sync.
>> *But* there were no complains with async commits AFAIK, which is a good thing.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list