[infinispan-dev] Hybrid locking scheme in ISPN 5.2.0

[Manik Surtani]

On 15 May 2012, at 17:33, Paolo Romano wrote:

> On 5/15/12 5:21 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 15 May 2012, at 17:10, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>> 
>>> You have not yet given me a single reason why we should put back something that's flawed. All you've said is: i rely on X and I want it back.
>> 
>> Well, the old scheme was broken and there are several good reasons why we moved to a more consistent approach.  
> I agree Manik, the new locking scheme has been a major improvement, it makes no sense to spend effort to re-base it on 5.2 ... it's only that a certain point we misunderstood (or if you want, hoping) that it was still available somewhere using some mysterious configuration flag :-)

Well, I'm sorry to disappoint … :(

>> 
>> Diego, can't your work be modified to work with the new schemes?
> That's the plan. It can, and it will... the point is if we will make it in time for our project's review (mid june)... but we like challenges! ;-)

Great!  :)

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120515/394446fd/attachment.html