[infinispan-dev] Hybrid locking scheme in ISPN 5.2.0

[Mircea Markus]

On 15 May 2012, at 17:21, Manik Surtani wrote:

> 
> On 15 May 2012, at 17:10, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> 
>> You have not yet given me a single reason why we should put back something that's flawed. All you've said is: i rely on X and I want it back.
> 
> Well, the old scheme was broken and there are several good reasons why we moved to a more consistent approach.  
> 
> Diego, can't your work be modified to work with the new schemes?

+1

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120521/f11e340b/attachment.html