[infinispan-dev] design for cluster events (wiki page)
Mircea Markus
mmarkus at redhat.com
Thu Oct 31 15:07:32 EDT 2013
On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Dennis Reed <dereed at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 02:18 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
>>
>>> Also if we did have read only, what criteria would cause those nodes
>>> to be writeable again?
>> Once you become the primary partition, e.g. when a view is received
>> where view.size() >= N where N is a predefined threshold. Can be
>> different, as long as it is deterministic.
>>
>>> There is no guarantee when the other nodes
>>> will ever come back up or if there will ever be additional ones anytime soon.
>> If a system picks the Primary Partition approach, then it can become
>> completely inaccessible (read-only). In this case, I envisage that a
>> sysadmin will be notified, who can then start additional nodes for the
>> system to acquire primary partition and become accessible again.
>
> There should be a way to manually modify the primary partition status.
> So if the admin knows the nodes will never return, they can manually
> enable the partition.
The status will be exposed through JMX at any point, disregarding if there's a split brain going on or not.
>
> Also, the PartitionContext should know whether the nodes left normally
> or not.
> If you have 5 nodes in a cluster, and you shut down 3 of them, you'll
> want the remaining two to remain available.
> But if there was a network partition, you wouldn't. So it needs to know
> the difference.
very good point again.
Thank you Dennis!
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list