[infinispan-dev] Question about Hibernate ORM 5.0 + Infinispan 8.0...

[Sanne Grinovero]

Good point. It works now (the issue is fixed) but we need to monitor both
projects. I'll see how far that can be automated. Can I have ci spam you in
case of failures?

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:34 Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks Sanne, this is a big help!  IMO, we should run the Hibernate 5.0
> testsuite again with Infinispan 8.x/master before releasing Infinispan
> 8.0.0.Final.
>
> Scott
>
> On 07/29/2015 07:24 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> > I'm fixing the ORM testsuite so that we can run it on both versions as
> >   https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10001
> >
> > Looks promising:
> > After working around the testsuite problem I'm down to two errors -
> > which seem more likely related to my changes than the Infinispan
> > version change - but will need some sleep before debugging those ;)
> >
> > Sanne
> >
> > On 29 July 2015 at 23:09, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org> wrote:
> >> On 29 July 2015 at 22:08, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org> wrote:
> >>> On 29 July 2015 at 21:58, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> With Paul's HHH-9999 fix, we can now compile and pass the ORM tests
> with
> >>>> Infinispan 7.3.x.  We can also compile Hibernate 5.0 against
> Infinispan
> >>>> 8.0.0.Beta2 but get ORM test failures http://pastebin.com/T2Yt3gdn
> >>>
> >>> Let me guess.. you expect Infinispan 8 to parse configuration files
> >>> meant for Infinispan 7?
> >>
> >> I was wrong, the problem is caused by this commit, which makes
> >> Infinispan now very picky on not having used AbstractInfinispanTest as
> >> a base class:
> >>   https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/commit/c9dfb
> >>
> >> Hibernate uses the Infinispan core testing helpers, but doesn't use
> >> TestNG so I'm not sure what the best solution is here.
> >> Should we set the thread name consistently in all Hibernate tests too?
> >> Seems quite pointless, the tests aren't run in parallel either.
> >>
> >> Could the helper be made a bit more tolerant for other use cases? Or
> >> maybe I should add a system property to have it change behaviour?
> >> I'd prefer to set the system property for Infinispan's own use, and
> >> default to lenient so that other people can reuse the helpers w/o
> >> these contraints.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sanne
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20150730/93784f5b/attachment-0001.html