[jboss-as7-dev] Default Configuration Namespace

[Brian Stansberry]

Go ahead, thanks. The discussion of whether to try and write an old 
schema version doesn't mean we can't change the default.

On 9/23/11 9:30 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> Anyone mind if I make these changes?  My next changes are dependent on
> being on the next version of the schema.
>
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
>
>
> On 09/23/2011 03:03 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> We should shift the 1.1 as the default and the marshallers should write
>> the latest.
>>
>> On 9/23/11 8:57 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>> Also one more question.
>>>
>>> Which version should the server now be writing when the configuration is
>>> persisted?
>>>
>>> Do we have a policy for everything to write using the latest schema
>>> version or are we going to be trying to use the version specified until
>>> new elements/attributes are encountered?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/23/2011 02:33 PM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>>> Now that 7.0.2 is out and the only subsequent planned releases are for
>>>> 7.1 can we switch the namespace for all default configuration to
>>>> 'urn:jboss:domain:1.1'?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat