[jboss-as7-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Replace hardcoded URLs and adresses with arquillian resources.
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Thu Feb 9 14:13:33 EST 2012
On 2/9/12 12:53 PM, Ondřej Žižka wrote:
> Brian Stansberry píše v Čt 09. 02. 2012 v 12:22 -0600:
>> On 2/9/12 11:50 AM, OndřejŽižka wrote:
>> > Well, non-Arq tests know what server they communicate to, so they should
>> > use the same values.
>> >
>>
>> What same values?
> Oh, I see what I mean. So yes, system props are the answer:
> Normally, Arq takes the sys props passed to it from maven -> surefire ->
> junit.
> For non-Arq tests, they need to read these system properties "manually".
>
> I will document these props in
> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/AS+7+Testsuite+Test+Developer+Guide#
> <https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/AS+7+Testsuite+Test+Developer+Guide# >
> tmrw or during next week.
>
Excellent. Thanks for driving this. Once that's ready if I see patches
that don't follow the guidelines I'll start kicking them back with a
link to that doc.
>
>> > For tests that need to access the server prior to deployment - depends
>> > on what kind of access would they need. Managememt? I may pass the IP
>> > and mgmt port to tests as an additional system property.
>> >
>>
>> Management is the case I know of. For example, setting up a security
>> domain or something that the deployment requires. System properties
>> would be fine; that's how it was done in AS 3,4,5,6. I figure that's the
>> answer to my"What same values?" question above.
> Yes.
>
> Regards,
> Ondra
>
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > Ondra
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Brian Stansberry píše vČt 09. 02. 2012 v 11:07 -0600:
>> >> On the JIRA, please document how to get the appropriate configuration
>> >> element from the test environment for situations where
>> >> @ArquillianResource won't work. For example, non-Arquillian tests, and
>> >> tests that need to access the server prior to deployment.
>> >>
>> >> On 2/9/12 10:42 AM, OndřejŽižka wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd like to ask everyone to fix"their" tests regarding $SUBJ.
>> >> > E.g. this is not acceptable:
>> >> > ModelControllerClient client =
>> >> > ModelControllerClient.Factory.create(InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1"),
>> >> > 9999, getCallbackHandler());
>> >> > or
>> >> > MBeanServerConnection mbeanServer = JMXConnectorFactory.connect(new
>> >> > JMXServiceURL("service:jmx:remoting-jmx://127.0.0.1:9999")).getMBeanServerConnection();
>> >> >
>> >> > Such like these MUST be rewritten to fetch the addresses and ports from
>> >> > an injected @ArquillianResource.
>> >> >
>> >> > Here's a tracking jira:https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3696
>> >> > Empty so far. Next week, I'll start going through the tests looking for
>> >> > such cases, and fixing them. Or, creating jiras and assigning them to
>> >> > the test authors.
>> >> > That's why I hope this call to action will relieve me from most of that
>> >> > tedious work :)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for cooperation.
>> >> > Ondra
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> >> > jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org> <mailto:jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
More information about the jboss-as7-dev
mailing list